"WELCOME IN MY BLOG"

Selamat Datang di Blog Saya Semoga Pengunjungan Anda ke Blog Saya Bisa Memberikan Manfaat untuk Anda dan Terimakasih atas Kunjungannya

Jumat, 18 November 2011

Fundamentalisme di dalam Kekristenan

Fundamentalisme di dalam kekristenan adalah studi yang berfokus pada gerakan fundamentalisme di dalam kekristenan.[1] Fundamentalisme sendiri sebenarnya sulit untuk didefinisikan dan dibicarakan sebab batas-batasnya tidak jelas.[1] Kelompok-kelompok Kristen yang ada memiliki beragam sikap terhadap penggunaan istilah ini.[1] Ada yang terang-terangan menolak sebutan fundamentalis seperti kelompok di Inggris yang lebih suka disebut evangelikal-konservatif.[1] Ada juga yang dengan bangga menyatakan diri sebagai kelompok fundamentalis, seperti William B. Riley yang mendirikan Asosiasi Kristen Fundamentalis Dunia pada tahun 1919.[2] Akan tetapi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa fundamentalisme secara organisasi bukanlah suatu kelompok yang khusus dan spesifik, sebab ciri-ciri dan semangat fundamentalisme dapat tersebar di dalam banyak gereja dan denominasi.[1]

Definisi
Kendati sulit mendefinisikan gerakan ini, namun ada beberapa definisi yang berasal dari orang-orang yang mengaku diri sebagai seorang fundamentalis Kristen:
• Menurut George W. Dollar, fundamentalisme adalah eksposisi literal terhadap seluruh perintah dan perilaku-perilaku yang berasal dari Alkitab dan militansi terbuka terhadap segala perintah dan perilaku yang tidak Alkitabiah.[3]
• Kemudian Jerry Falwel mendefinisikan fundamentalisme sebagai afirmasi terhadap kepercayaan Kristen dan gaya hidup Kristen tertentu yang menentang masyarakat sekuler pada umumnya.[4]
Latar Belakang
Penerbitan buku "Hal-Hal Fundamental" [5] (dalam bahasa Inggris The Fundamentals) merupakan salah satu tonggak awal dari gerakan fundamentalisme Kristen.[6] Buku tersebut berisi doktrin-doktrin fundamental kekristenan yang ditegakkan kembali dan perlu diejawantahkan di dalam kehidupan setiap orang Kristen.[7] Buku ini diterbitkan sebagai reaksi terhadap situasi kekristenan dan gereja-gereja di Amerika Serikat pada waktu itu yang dipandang mengalami kemerosotan iman menghadapi dunia sekitarnya.[7] Memang sejak abad ke-19 hingga awal abad ke-20 ketika buku itu terbit, gereja-gereja di Amerika Serikat sedang tertekan oleh perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, khususnya ajaran Charles Darwin tentang teori evolusi.[7] Ada lima doktrin yang menjadi inti dari pemikiran fundamentalisme, yaitu:
• 1. Pengakuan terhadap doktrin ineransi Alkitab (Alkitab tidak dapat salah).[6]
• 2. Pengakuan akan keilahian Kristus.[6]
• 3. Kelahirannya dari seorang perawan bernama Maria.[6]
• 4. Kematian Kristus sebagai penebusan dosa dunia.[6]
• 5. Kebangkitan Kristus secara jasmaniah dan kedatangan Kristus kembali ke bumi.[6]
Setelah itu, selama tahun 1930-an hingga tahun 1960-an, gerakan kaum Fundamentalis berfokus pada pemisahan diri dengan denominasi-denominasi Kristen yang ada, seperti Baptis, Presbiterian, Metodis, Episkopalian, Pentakostal, dan sebagainya.[8] Akan tetapi, tetap saja gerakan tersebut bukanlah sebuah kelompok yang satu melainkan terpisah-pisah dan hanya dipersatukan oleh kesamaan ciri-ciri.[8]
Ciri-Ciri
Secara umum, ada beberapa doktrin Kristen yang dianggap sebagai dasar iman, seperti lima doktrin yang disebutkan di atas.[6] Akan tetapi, ada beberapa ciri lain dari gerakan fundamentalisme Kristen.
Kontra Teologi Liberal-Modern dan Sekularisasi
Perhatian utama dari gerakan fundamentalisme adalah reduksi yang terjadi di dalam kekristenan akibat liberalisme keagamaan serta sekularisasi masyarakat Amerika.[9] Mereka berupaya menjaga apa yang mereka anggap sebagai dasar utama dari kekristenan yang Ortodoks, yang mereka anggap telah direduksi oleh perkembangan masyarakat dan ilmu pengetahuan, misalnya soal penafsiran Alkitab yang terlalu liberal.[9]
Untuk melawan dampak sekularisasi yang dianggap tidak sesuai dengan iman Kristen, kaum fundamentalis melawan dengan cara menegakkan standar moral dan perilaku hidup tertentu, yang serupa dengan tradisi revivalisme Amerika Serikat, misalnya pelarangan atas rokok, minum-minuman keras, berdansa, bermain kartu, pakaian yang dianggap tidak sopan, dan pembatasan aktivitas seksual.[2] Pembatasan-pembatasan seperti ini menolong mereka untuk hidup suci menurut apa yang mereka yakini.[2] Meskipun demikian, mereka tidak menolak untuk berpartisipasi di dalam aspek-aspek lain dari kehidupan modern, seperti berbisnis dan sebagainya.[2]
Ineransi Alkitab
Menurut gerakan ini, kepercayaan Kristen yang fundamental terhadap ineransi Alkitab sedang diserang oleh pendekatan liberal-kritis terhadap Alkitab, yang berarti menyerang dasar iman Kristen.[2] Selain itu, mereka melihat bahwa peradaban Amerika Serikat didasarkan pada Alkitab, sehingga membela kebenaran Alkitab berarti membela peradaban Amerika Serikat pula.[2] Bagi mereka, penafsiran Alkitab yang benar dan menghargai ineransi Alkitab adalah penafsiran yang literal, yang berarti juga mempercayai bahwa Alkitab akurat secara historis dan saintifik.[2] Cara penafsiran yang tidak mengakui hal-hal itu sama saja dengan tidak mengakui ineransi Alkitab.[2] Dari keteguhan mengenai ineransi Alkitab inilah, kaum fundamentalis menyusun doktrin-doktrin yang dianggap fundamental, seperti lima doktrin yang telah disampaikan di atas.[2]
Militansi
George M. Marsden berpendapat bahwa gerakan fundamentalisme memiliki akar dari gerakan evangelikal, namun perbedaan di antara keduanya adalah militansi yang inheren pada gerakan fundamentalisme.[8] Mereka dituntut bukan hanya percaya terhadap doktrin-doktrin fundamental kekristenan, tetapi juga harus mau memperjuangkannya melalui pertarungan melawan teologi liberal, humanisme sekuler, dan sebagainya.[2] Militansi tersebut juga dilakukan melalui gaya hidup tertentu, seperti dijelaskan di atas, serta dengan memenangkan ‘jiwa-jiwa bagi Kristus’.[2] Selain itu, militansi mereka ditunjukkan melalui perjuangan dalam bidang politik yang mengusahakan legislasi tertentu, misalnya dalam hal diwajibkannya doa dan pembacaan di sekolah-sekolah umum, pelarangan ketat terhadap pornografi, pelarangan terhadap perjuangan hak-hak sipil kaum gay dan feminis radikal, dan sebagainya.[10] Militansi tersebut juga seringkali membawa pemisahan antara gerakan fundamentalisme dengan kelompok-kelompok Kristen lainnya, dan juga menjadi batas pemisah antara kaum fundamentalisme keras dan kaum fundamentalisme moderat.[9]
Jenis-jenis
Fundamentalisme Keras
Fundamentalisme keras memiliki karakteristik tertentu seperti pemisahan sepenuhnya dari liberalisme agama, kepercayaan sepenuhnya terhadap inspirasi mekanis Alkitab tanpa ada distorsi sama sekali, dan menganggap Alkitab versi King James sebagai teks Alkitab yang paling benar.[9] Akan tetapi, dua hal yang benar-benar memisahkan mereka dari kaum fundamentalisme moderat adalah doktrin dispensionalisme dan separatisme.[9] Doktrin dispensionalisme pada intinya melihat bahwa dunia akan hancur karena kejahatannya, dan orang-orang Kristen tidak dapat berbuat sesuatu selain menunggu Allah yang akan bertindak secara ajaib.[2] Kemudian ciri lain adalah separatisme total terhadap orang-orang Kristen lain yang tidak sepaham dengan mereka serta dengan dunia yang jahat.[9] Bila ada orang-orang Kristen yang tidak sepaham dengan mereka berarti mereka bukan Kristen sejati dan berkompromi dengan dunia.[9]
Fundamentalisme Moderat
Fundamentalisme moderat adalah varian gerakan fundamentalisme yang mengambil jarak dari gerakan fundamentalisme keras, serta lebih terbuka dalam beberapa hal.[9] Tokoh utamanya adalah Jerry Falwell.[9]. Keterbukaan mereka tampak dalam hal memberi tempat kepada intelektualitas Kristen, berkomitmen pada reformasi sosial, serta mau melakukan oto-kritik terhadap gerakan fundamentalisme.[9] Oto-kritik yang dilakukan terhadap gerakan fundamentalis adalah mentalitas yang tidak mau mengubah diri, terlalu bergantung pada pemimpin tertentu, terlalu hitam-putih dalam melihat sesuatu, terlalu otoriter, dan terlalu sering terpecah-belah karena merasa benar.[9] Kemudian mereka juga tidak menyetujui doktrin dispensionalisme sehingga kaum fundamentalisme moderat turut berjuang dalam mereformasi masyarakat dan keterlibatan sosial.[9]
Referensi
1. James Barr. 1994. Fundamentalisme. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia. Hal. 1-2, 402.
2. George M. Marsden. 1990. "Defining American Fundamentalism". In The Fundamentalist Phenomenon. Norman J. Cohen (ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. P. 31.
3. George W. Dollar. 1973. A History of Fundamentalism in America. Greenville: Bob Jones University Press. P. XV.
4. Jerry Falwell, et. al.(eds.). 1981. The Fundamentalist Phenomenon. Garden City, New York: Doubleday. P. 6.
5. The Fundamentals: A Testimony of the Truth, 12 vol. (Chicago: Testimony Publishing Company, 1910-1915).
6. Jaroslav Pelikan. 1990. "Fundamentalism and/or Orthodoxy? Toward an Understanding of the Fundamentalist Phenomenon". In The Fundamentalist Phenomenon. Norman J. Cohen (ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. P. 3.
7. Liem Khiem Yang. 1992. "Fundamentalisme dalam Gereja". Di dalam Fundamentalisme, Agama-Agama dan Teknologi. Soetarman, et. al., eds. hal 17-19. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
8. George M. Marsden. 1991. Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelism. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
9. Clark H. Pinnock. 1990. "Defining American Fundamentalism: A Response". In The Fundamentalist Phenomenon. Norman J. Cohen (ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. P. 38-55.
10. Richard John Neuhaus. 1990. "Fundamentalism and the American Polity". In The Fundamentalist Phenomenon. Norman J. Cohen (ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. P. 142.
Diperoleh dari "http://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fundamentalisme_di_dalam_Kekristenan&oldid=4503874"
Kategori:
• Istilah Kristen
• Teologi Kristen
• Fundamentalisme

Kamis, 10 November 2011

Relationship of The Muslim with Non-Muslims

Special Consideration for the People of the Book

While Islam does not prohibit Muslims to be kind and generous to peoples of other religions, even if they are idolaters and polytheists, as for example, the polytheists of Arabia, concerning whom the above verses were revealed, it looks upon the People of the Book, that is, Jews and Christians, with special regard, whether they reside in a Muslim society or outside it.
The Qur'an never addresses them without saying, "O People of the Book" or "O You who have been given the Book," indicating that they were originally people of a revealed religion. For this reason these exists a relationship of mercy and spiritual kinship between them and the Muslims, all having in common the principles of the one true religion sent by Allah through his prophets (peace be
on them all): He has ordained for (the Muslims) the same religion which He enjoined on Noah, and that which We have revealed to thee (Muhammad) and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus: that you should establish the faith and make no division in it....(42:13).
Muslims are required to believe in all the Books revealed by Allah and in all the prophets sent by Him; otherwise they are not Believers. Say: We (Muslims) believe in Allah and in what He has revealed to us, and in what He revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes (of Israel), and in what was given to Moses and Jesus, and in what was given to (all) the prophets by their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him do we submit. (2:136).
Consequently, if the People of the Book read the Qur'an, they will find in it praise for their Books, messengers, and prophets. If Muslims hold discussions with the People of the Book, they should avoid such approaches as cause bitterness or arouse hostility: And do not dispute with the People of the Book except by (the way) which is best, unless it be with such of them as transgress, and say, 'We believe in what has been sent down to us and sent down to you, and our God and your God is one, and to Him do we submit.' (29:46).
We have already seen how Islam permits eating with the People of the Book, sharing the meat they slaughter, and marrying their women, marriage being a relationship of mutual love and mercy. As Allah Ta'ala says: ...The food of those who were given the Scripture (before you) is permitted to you and your food is permitted to them. And (lawful to you in marriage are) chaste women from among the Believers and chaste women from among those who were given the Scripture before you.... (5:6 (5)).
This relates to the People of the Book in general. However, Christians in particular have been given special status by the Qur'an and are considered much closer to the hearts of the Believers.

Non-Muslim Residents of an Islamic State
The above injunctions include all People of the Book wherever they may be. However, those people who live under the protection of an Islamic government enjoy special privileges. They are referred to as "the Protected People" (ahl al-dhimmah or dhimmies), meaning that Allah, His Messenger (peace be on him), and the community of Muslims have made a covenant with them that they may live in safety and security under the Islamic government.
In modern terminology, dhimmies are "citizens" of the Islamic state. From the earliest period of Islam to the present day, Muslims are in unanimous agreement that they enjoy the same rights and carry the same responsibilities as Muslims themselves, while being free to practice their own faiths.
The Prophet (peace be on him) emphasized the duties of Muslims toward dhimmies, threatening anyone who violates them with the wrath and punishment of Allah. He said, "He who hurts a dhimmi hurts me, and he who hurts me annoys Allah." (Reported by al- Tabarani in Al-awsat on good authority.)
Whoever hurts a dhimmi, I am his adversary, and I shall be an adversary to him on the Day of Resurrection. (Reported by al-Khatib on good authority.) On the Day of Resurrection I shall dispute with anyone who oppresses a person from among the People of the Covenant, or infringes on his right, or puts a responsibility on him which is beyond his strength, or takes something from him against his will. (Reported by Abu Daoud.) The successors of the Prophet, the caliphs, safeguarded these rights and sanctities of non- Muslim citizens, and the jurists of Islam, in spite of the variation of their opinions regarding many other matters, are unanimous in emphasizing these rights and sanctities.
Says the Maliki jurist, Shaha al-Deen al-Qarafi: The covenant of protection imposes upon us certain obligations toward the ahl al-dhimmah. They are our neighbors, under our shelter and protection upon the guarantee of Allah, His Messenger (peace be on him), and the religion of Islam. Whoever violates these obligations against any one of them by so much as an abusive word, by slandering his reputation, or by doing him some injury or assisting in it, has breached the guarantee of Allah, His Messenger (peace be on him), and the religion of Islam. (From the book, Al- uruq, by al- Qarafi.)
And the Zahiri jurist, Ibn Hazm, says: If one is a dhimmi, and the enemy comes with his force to take him, it is our obligation to fight the enemy with soldiers and weapons and to give our lives for him, thus honoring the guarantee of Allah and His Messenger (peace be on him). To hand him over to the enemy would mean to dishonothis guarantee. (From the book, Maratib al-ijma', by Ibn Hazm.)

Meaning of Friendship with Non-Muslims

A question which troubles some people and which is sometimes discussed openly is the following. How can we show kindness affection, and good treatment to non-Muslims since Allah Ta'ala Himself prohibits Muslims to take non-believers as friends, allies, and supporters in such verses as the following: O you who believe, do not take the Jews and Christians as friends; they are the friends (only) of each other. And whoever among you turns to them (for friendship) is certainly one of them; indeed, Allah does not guide the people who do wrong. Yet thou seest those in whose hearts is a disease racing toward them...(5:54-55(51-52)).
The answer to this is that these verses are not unconditional, to be applied to every Jew,Christian, or non-Muslim. Interpreting them in this manner contradicts the injunctions of the Qur'an which enjoin affection and kindness to the good and peace-loving peoples of every religion, as well as the verses which permit marriage to the women of the People of the Book, with all that Allah says concerning marriage—"and He has put love and mercy between you" (30:21)—and the verse concerning the Christians: ...And thou wilt find those who say, 'Surely we are Christians.' to be nearest to them (the Muslims) in affection....(5:85 (82)) (The terms Christian and Christianity do not appear in the Christian scriptures nor can they be attributed to Jesus (pbuh) himself. The followers of Jesus were known as Nasara (helpers) and this is the word used in the Arabic text of the Qur'an; the name "Christian" was originally used by those who held the followers in contempt.)
The verses cited above were revealed in connection with those people who were hostile to Islam and made war upon the Muslims. Accordingly, it is not permissible for the Muslim to support or assist them—that is, to be their ally—nor to entrust them with secrets at the expense of his own religion and community. This point is explained in other verses, in which Allah Ta'ala says: They will spare nothing to ruin you; they yearn for what makes you suffer. Hatred has been expressed by their mouths, but what their hearts conceal is still greater. Thus have We made clear to you the revelations (or signs), if you possess understanding. Ah! You love them, but they do not love you....(3:118-119).
This ayah throws light on the character of such people, who conceal great enmity and hatred against the Muslims in their hearts and whose tongues express some of the effects of such hostility.
Allah Ta'ala also says, Thou wilt not find a people who believe in Allah and the Last Day loving those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even though they may be their fathers or their sons or their brothers or their kin....(58:22).
Opposition to Allah is not simply belief but includes hostility toward Islam and Muslims Allah also says, O you who believe, do not take My enemy and your enemy as friends, offering them affection, even though they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth, driving out the Messenger and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord....(60:1).
This verse was revealed in connection with the pagans of Makkah, who declared war on Allah and His Messenger (peace be on him), driving the Muslims out of their homes simply because they said, "Our Lord is Allah." With this type of people, friendship and alliance cannot be permitted. Yet in spite of this, the Qur'an did not dismiss the hope that some day there might be a reconciliation; it did not declare utter disappointment in them but encouraged the Muslims to entertain the hope of better circumstances and improved relationships, for in the same surah Allah says: It may be that Allah will bring about affection between you and those who are your enemies from among them. And Allah is All-Powerful, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. (60:7).
This Qur'anic statement gives the assurance that this bitter hostility and deep hatred will pass way, as it is also stated in the hadith, "Hate your enemy mildly; he may become your friend one day." (Reported by al-Tirmidhi . Al-Bayheqi reported it in Shi'ab aliman from Abu Hurairah. Al-Suyuti called it "good," transmitting the first part as "Love your friend mildly; he may become your enemy one day.").
The prohibition against befriending the enemies of Islam is even more emphatic when they are stronger than the Muslims, crushing hopes and generating fear in the minds of people. In such a situation, only hypocrites and those in whose hearts there is a disease hasten to befriend them, giving them help today in order to benefit from them tomorrow. Allah Ta'ala describes this situation as follows: Yet thou seest those in whose hearts is a disease racing toward them (the enemies of Islam), saying, 'We are afraid that a change of fortune may befall us.' But it may be that Allah will give (thee) the victory or some Page 146 decision from Himself, and then they will become regretful for what they thought secretly within themselves. (5:55 (52) ) And again, Give to the hypocrites the tidings that they will have a grievous punishment. Do those who take the unbelievers as friends instead of the Believers seek honor among them? For indeed all honor belongs to Allah alone. (4:138-139).

Seeking Help From Non-Muslims
There is no harm done if Muslims, at either the private or governmental level, seek help from non-Muslims in technical matters which have no connection with the religion—for example in medicine, industry, or agriculture. At the same time it is of course extremely desirable that Muslims become self-sufficient in all such fields.
We see from the life of the Prophet (peace be on him) that he employed 'Abdullah bin 'Uraiqit, a polytheist, to be his guide on his flight (hijrah) from Makkah to Madinah. Scholars have concluded from this that a person's unbelief does not mean that he is basically untrustworthy, for what could be more risky than depending on a guide to show the route, particularly in fleeing from Makkah to Madinah?
Going considerably beyond this, scholars say that it is permissible for the leader of the Muslims to seek help from non-Muslims, especially the People of the Book, in military matters, and to give them an equal share of spoils with the Muslims. Al-Zuhri reported that the Messenger of Allah (peace be on him) sought help from some of the Jews in a war and gave them a share of the spoils and that Safwan bin Umayyah fought on the side of the Prophet (peace be on him) while still an idolater. (Reported by Sa'id in his Sunan.) The condition for seeking help from a non-Muslim is that he be trusted by the Muslims; otherwise, help may not be sought from him Since it is prohibited to seek help from unreliable Muslims, such as those who spread rumors and anxieties, this is the more true in the case of non-believers. (AI-mughni, vol. 8, p. 41.)
The Muslim is permitted to give gifts to non-Muslims and to accept gifts from them. It is sufficient here to mention that the Prophet (peace be on him) accepted gifts from non-Muslim kings. (Reported by Ahmad and al-Tirmidhi.) Scholars of ahadith state that there are many ahadith which report that the Prophet (peace be on him) accepted gifts from non-Muslims, and Umm Salmah, a wife of the Prophet, narrated that the Prophet (peace be on him) told her, "I have sent al-Najashi (The Christian ruler of Abyssinia who secretly embraced Islam. (Trans.)) a robe and some silk." (Reported by Ahmad and al-Tabarani.)
Indeed, Islam respects a human being only because he is human; how much the more then, if he is from the People of the Book and still more if he is a dhimmi? Once a funeral procession passed by the Prophet (peace be on him) and he stood up. Thereupon someone remarked, "O Messenger of Allah, it is the funeral of a Jew." The Prophet (peace be on him) replied, "Was he not a soul?" (Reported by al-Bukhari.) Thus, truly, in Islam every human being has a dignity and a place.

The Extension of Islam's Universal Mercy to Animals

The universal mercy of Islam embraces not only human beings, whether unbelievers, People of the Book, orMuslims, but all other living creaof Allah as well. Accordingly, Islam prohibits cruelty to animals. Thirteen hundred years before any societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals were established, Islam had made kindness to animals a part of its faith and cruelty to them a sufficient reason for a person to be thrown into the Fire.
The Prophet (peace be on him) related to his Companions the story of a man who found a dog panting with thirst. The man went down into a well, filled his shoes with water which he gave to the dog, and continued to do so until the dog's thirst was quenched. The Prophet (peace be on him) said, 'Then Allah was grateful to him and forgave him his sins.' The Companions asked, 'Is there a reward for us in relation to animals, O Messenger of Allah?' He replied 'There is a reward in (relation to) every living creature.' (Reported by al-Bukhari.)
Side by side with this radiant picture of Allah's forgiveness and pleasure, the Prophet (peace be on him) drew another picture depicting Allah's anger and punishment. He said, A woman was sent to the Fire because of a cat. She imprisoned her and neither fed her nor set her free to feed upon the rodents of the earth. (Reported by al-Bukhari.)
Respect for Allah's living creatures reached such an extent that when the Prophet (peace be on him) saw a donkey with a branded face he denounced such a practice saying, "I would not brand an animal except on the part of its body farthest from its face." (Reported by Muslim.)
In another report, he passed by a donkey with a branded face and said, "Have you not heard that I have cursed anyone who brands an animal on its face or who hits it on its face?" (Reported by Abu Daoud and al-Tirmidhi.)
We have already mentioned that when Ibn 'Umar saw some people practicing archery using a hen as a target, he said, "The Prophet (peace be on him) cursed anyone who made a living thing into a target." And Ibn 'Abbas said, The Prophet (peace be on him) forbade that animals be made to fight each other, since people would goad animals into fighting each other until one of them was pecked or gored to death, or close to it. Ibn 'Abbas also reported that the Prophet (peace be on him) strongly condemned the castration of animals. (Reported by al-Bazzar on sound authority.)
The Qur'an condemned the Arabs of jahiliyyah for their slitting the ears of cattle, calling this a practice inspired by Satan. (4:119)
In relation to the method of slaughtering an animal, we have already pointed out that Islam insists that the manner of slaughter should be that which is least painful to the victim and its requiring that the knife be sharpened but not in front of the animal. Islam also prohibits the slaughtering of one animal in front of another.Never, prior to Islam, had the world witnessed such concern for animals, a concern which was beyond its imagination.